Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkyol, S. Pelin
dc.contributor.authorKrishna, Kala
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jinwen
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-29T15:23:10Z
dc.date.available2018-08-29T15:23:10Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/MINEDU/5950
dc.descriptiondoi: 10.3386/w24930es_ES
dc.description.abstractPISA is seen as the gold standard for evaluating educational outcomes worldwide. Yet, as it is a low-stakes exam, students may not take it seriously resulting in downward biased scores and inaccurate rankings. This paper provides a method to identify and account for non-serious behavior by leveraging information in computer-based assessments in PISA 2015. The authors show that this bias is large: a country can rise up to 15 places in rankings if its students took the exam seriously. The researchers ask where the bias is coming from and show that around half of it comes from the proportion of non-serious students, while 36% comes from their ability, with the remaining coming from the extent of non-seriousnesses_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherNational Bureau of Economic Researches_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNBER Working Paper;24930
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.sourceMINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓNes_ES
dc.sourceRepositorio institucional - MINEDUes_ES
dc.subjectEvaluación PISAes_ES
dc.subjectEvaluación del rendimiento escolares_ES
dc.subjectComportamiento del alumnoes_ES
dc.subjectActitud del estudiantees_ES
dc.titleTaking PISA Seriously : How Accurate are Low Stakes Exams?es_ES
dc.typeReporte técnicoes_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record